Advertisement Banner

No title to property? Woman showed proof to gain 73 pct share of the property.

Is your name on all the assets you paid / are paying for today?

Frankly, if you like to share with someone to buy a property, it’s best to do it properly. The Sale and Purchase Agreement should have your name too and it’s not good enough to just base on trust. It may not be due to trust sometimes because circumstances change / happen. Here’s one case where the buyer wanted to save on taxes and thus did not have her name on the property. She trusted her MBA course-mate instead.

Then, she got involved in a court case where the wife of the man she trusted with the property purchase wanted the court to declare that she had no stake in the property. Oh dear, not an easy time for her definitely.

Article in A woman (Ms. Yeow) and a married man bought a $1.7 million house together as an investment, but put the property under the man’s sole name to “save costs” on stamp duties and property tax. The agreement was for the house to be sold and the profits shared once the price hits S$3.5 million. Ms Yeow was transferring $7,000 to $10,000 every month to Mr Ramasamy to pay the mortgage. her total contribution was S$833,600 and Mr Ramasamy’s as S$310,000.

The married man’s wife staked her claim on the house in Hougang. Ms. Yeow was a course-mate to the man in a Master of Business Administration programme. Ms. Yeow showed proof that she contributed 73 percent to the purchase and related expenses. The judge ruled that after having carefully analysed the evidence, Ms. Yeow has indeed proven that she and Mr Ramasamy had intended for their beneficial interest in the property to be apportioned according to each person’s financial contributions. Please do read the article in full here: Article in

An oral agreement is still a valid agreement

By the way, an agreement does not need to be in written form in order to be valid. An oral agreement is also valid BUT it would be harder to prove and if there’s just an oral agreement between two persons, then it gets even harder to prove if both parties are saying different things. This is why when it comes to something which is S$1.14 million (RM3.53 million), better not rely on oral agreements and it’s not always possible to prove what was agreed or in this case, showing proof that she did pay for the property and that her stake was higher than the person whose name is on the property.

I think in this case, justice prevailed if all the facts of the case are as per reported. Happy understanding and learning from such a case yeah.

Love news like this and more? Sign up for daily investment news updates. Alternatively, Follow me on Telegram here.

Please LIKE FB page to get daily updates about the property market beyond articles. Else, follow me on Twitter here.

Sign up for KopiWeekly. (only once per week of property, finance, investment news and more)

Next suggested article: Renting without a tenancy agreement?

**In Article Advertisements Banner

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Few seconds to subscribe for FREE and get property investment tips, latest financial and property news and more.

Join 1,940 other subscribers.
Motion arrow towards right
Motion arrow towards right
Charles Tan The Founder The Writer Kopiandproperty
Charles Tan

Charles is Founder of He writes from his investment experience for the the past 20 years in investments including property, stock, unit trust and more as well as readings and conversations with many property gurus in the industry. is an independent property blog which is not affiliated to any media company, property developer or even real estate agencies.


Advertisement Banner

Facebook Comment

Table of Contents

Most Recent Posts

join the family

Like us for daily investment news and more

Hit the like

%d bloggers like this: